The Limited Monopoly: INTERNATIONAL PATENT LAW: PCT Applications

You don't have the latest version of Adobe Flash Player.

Please update your flash player.

Please login or register to make a comment!

10 | The ROCHESTER ENGINEER | SEPTEMBER 2009 E is article discusses what happens after you @ le an international patent application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). E e PCT is a patent application process, rather than a patent granting process. Patents are granted in each country that you select to enter via the PCT.

So actions that you take with your PCT application can inA uence prosecution in each country that you enter through the PCT. E is article will discuss some actions that can be taken after the PCT application is @ led and before each country is entered. A Refresher E ere are several ways to @ le foreign patent applications in countries where you wish to pursue patent protection.

You can @ rst @ le directly in each foreign country through a patent agent in that country. You can also @ rst @ le a patent application in a Paris Convention or WTO member country, and then @ le separate patent applications in other Paris or WTO countries within 12 months of @ ling that @ rst application claiming priority to the @ rst @ ling date. You can also initially @ le a single cinternational d ... more. less.

patent application that has eC ect in all countries (currently 141) that are members of the PCT. Utilizing the PCT can save money and time. E e @ ling requirements of a PCT application and strict time deadlines are understood by agents that practice before the various PCT international authorities including the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). A brief summary of the PCT is available in our Limited Monopoly column of November 2007 1 . International Search and Written Opinion A PCT application may claim priority to an earlier @ led provisional, utility or foreign patent application, provided that it is @ led within 12 months from the @ ling date of that application (the cpriority date d). Your PCT application can also be the @ rst @ led application. At the end of processing under the PCT, you can proceed with your application in the U.S. and other PCT member countries when you enter the cNational Phase. d E e period of processing under the PCT is known as the cInternational Phase. d Approximately 16 months from the priority date (or nine months from the PCT application @ ling date if there is no prior application), you will receive the International Search Report (ISR) and Written Opinion (WO) of the International Searching Authority (ISA). E e International Searching Authority will be one of thirteen ISAs (soon to be @ fteen) in the PCT system, for example, the United States, Europe, Korea, Japan, Canada, Australia. E e ISAs available for any given international application depend upon the citizenship or nationality of the applicant(s) and the Receiving OD ce where the case is @ led. E e International Search and Written Opinion will address the novelty, non-obviousness, and industrial applicability of your invention. Article 19 Amendments You may disagree with the Written Opinion received from the ISA. You have several opportunities to address the issues raised in the Opinion. E e @ rst opportunity is through an Article 19 amendment, which must be @ led within two months from the date of transmittal of the Search and Written Opinion or 16 months from the priority date, whichever is later. An Article 19 amendment allows an applicant to amend only the claims in the application. It may be accompanied by a statement explaining the amendments to the claims and indicating any impact that such amendments might have on the description and the drawings (which cannot be amended under Article 19). E e statement must be limited to 500 words, and must not contain any disparaging comments on the International Search Report. It must also be in the language in which the international application will be published. E e statement will be published with the application and the amended claims. The Limited Monopoly The Limited Monopoly " INTERNATIONAL PATENT LAW: PCT Applications - Amendments and Demands by Robert Gunderman PE, T. David Reed, and John Hammond PE SEPTEMBER 2009 | The ROCHESTER ENGINEER | 11 The Limited Monopoly ,e Demand for International Preliminary Examination You also have the option to request International Preliminary Examination. Eis optional procedure provides the applicant with an opportunity to amend all parts of the application as well as submit arguments countering the @ndings in the Written Opinion of the ISA. It establishes a preliminary non-binding opinion by the International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of your invention as described and claimed. To request International Preliminary Examination, a cDemand d is @led along with the necessary fees within the later of three months from the date of transmittal of the search report or 22 months from the priority date. If you choose to @le a cDemand d for International Preliminary Examination, you are entering what is known as cChapter II of the international phase. d Article 34 Amendments You are entitled to amend the claims, as well as the description and the drawings, under Article 34 if, and only if, you @le a Demand for International Preliminary Examination. An Article 34 Amendment may contain amendments to the claims, description, and drawings, and also may contain a reply to the Written Opinion. Article 34 Amendments are entered to deal with obstacles to patentability that have been raised by the Written Opinion, and are similar to an ODce action response in U.S. patent prosecution. (New matter cannot be added to the application by amendment under either Article 19 or 34.) Why bother if no patent will be granted? As no patent will ever issue from a PCT application, why bother @ling an Article 19 Amendment, a Demand, or an Article 34 Amendment? Ee reason is simple. Eese actions will likely reduce prosecution costs when your PCT application enters the national phase and is examined in each country that you choose. Most examiners carefully consider the Search, Written Opinion, and International Preliminary Report on Patentability. So if you can amend your claims and provide sound arguments in an Amendment, resulting in an International Preliminary Report on Patentability that is favorable, your costs to prosecute patent applications in national phase countries will be reduced. You will not need to @le the same amendments and arguments, along with accompanying translations, fees, etc., in the patent applications that you @le in each national phase country. And on to the National Phase After 30 months from the priority date, the international phase ends and, if the applicant chooses, the application enters the national phase in the various countries of interest. It is the responsibility of the applicant or the applicant 9s agent to work with a patent agent in each country where patent protection is sought. Ee national phase starts by @ling a request for entry moving the PCT application into the national examination process, in each of these countries. Most countries require a patent agent to be a citizen of that country in order to prepare and prosecute patent applications in that country. Accordingly, patent agents that practice internationally t y p i c a l l y contract with associate foreign patent agent @rms to handle their foreign applications. L a n g u a g e , translations, and currency are just a few of the things that must be dealt with when practicing international patent law. General knowledge of the patent laws in each country and a good network of foreign associates make the process much easier. 1. Reprints may be obtained at www.patenteducation.com/patentarticles.html under the topic cInternational Patent Applications. d Photo credit: T. David Reed, http://www.pbase.com/worldhoppr/ts_2006 Authors Robert D. Gunderman P.E. (Patent Technologies, LLC www. patentechnologies.com ) and John M. Hammond P.E. (Patent Innovations LLC www.patent-innovations.com ) are both registered patent agents and licensed professional engineers. 5ey o4er several courses that qualify for PDH credits. More information can be found at www.patenteducation.com . Copyright 2009 John Hammond and Robert Gunderman, Jr. Note: 5is short article is intended only to provide cursory background information, and is not intended to be legal advice. No client relationship with the authors is in any way established by this article. 5is month we would like to thank T. David Reed, a PCT consultant in the US for the World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, for his contributions to this article. Mr. Reed is also a registered Patent Agent in the U.S. and Canada, and previously was responsible for International Patents at 5e Proctor and Gamble Co. His website www.tdrpatents.com contains further details of his extensive international experience.

less