Religion and Politics: The Ambivalent Majority

members of the clergy espousing their political views from the pulpit.<br><br> While seven-in-ten voters believe it is important for the president to have religious faith, there is widespread discomfort over politicians who speak publicly about how religious they are. Churches, synagogues and other religious institutions are overwhelmingly seen as positive forces in addressing society 9s problems. Yet the public 9s ambivalence over religion and politics is also reflected in divisions over ccharitable choice d 4 an initiative, approved as part of the 1996 welfare reform bill, which permits faith-based organizations to participate in government-funded social service programs.<br><br> A narrow majority (54%) supports funding religious organizations so they can run such government programs as job training or drug treatment services. There is considerably more backing (67%) when the issue is recast as allowing such groups to apply for government funding, along with other organizations, for these purposes. At a time when Joe Lieberman 9s appointment as the first Jew on a major party 9s presidential ticket has cast a spotlight on religion and politics, the latest Pew Research Center survey shows that 77% have favorable attitudes toward Jews.<br><br> That rating has slipped somewhat from 84% in 1997, but the current favorability mark for Jews is virtually the same as for Catholics (78%). There actually has been no increase in the number of voters who hold unfavorable impressions of Jews; rather, slightly more voters say they are unable to give an opinion of Jews compared with three years ago. The image of evangelical Christians has improved markedly in recent years 4 as the political visibility, if not the influence, of Christian conservatives has waned.<br><br> Overall, some 63% of voters rate evangelical Christians favorably, compared with just 41% in 1996. Some of the biggest -2- gains have come among Democrats and senior citizens, which are groups that tend to express the most concern about overt expressions of religious beliefs in politics. Six-in-ten Democrats now have favorable impressions of evangelicals, compared with 27% four years ago.<br><br> More Americans regard the Republican Party as the protector of religious values compared with the Democrats (39% to 30%, respectively). But the GOP 9s advantage on this issue has declined over the past four years; in 1996, 47% saw the Republicans as protectors of religious values while just 32% named the Democrats. In a more positive trend for the GOP, fewer voters now see the party as too closely tied to religious leaders (13% vs.<br><br> 20% in 1996). This survey of nearly 2,000 registered voters, conducted Aug. 24-Sept.<br><br> 10, is a collaborative project of The Pew Research Center and The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. The Forum is a new organization dedicated to research, discussion and debate on the role of religion in civic engagement, politics and public policy. The Observant Majority A solid majority of voters (61%) say they attend religious services at least once or twice a month 4 and 45% go at least once a week.<br><br> This is little changed from recent years: in 1997, 59% of the electorate said they frequently attended services (at least once a month), and virtually the same percentage (60%) reported frequent attendance in 1996. And nearly six-in-ten (59%) of those who attend services on a regular or even infrequent basis (at least a few times a year) say they are involved in church activities. With the high level of religious participation, it is probably not surprising that most Americans see churches, synagogues and other religious organizations as contributing meaningfully to society.<br><br> Fully 72% say these organizations help solve important social problems (28% say a great deal, while 44% say some). Just one-in-four believe religious groups do little or nothing to alleviate the nation 9s problems. Republicans are somewhat more likely to see religious groups playing a positive role.<br><br> Fully one-third of rank-and-file Republicans (34%) say churches, synagogues and other religious organizations contribute a great deal , compared with just 24% of Democrats and independents. Democrats Favor Charitable Choice A majority of voters also support funding religious organizations so they can provide social services, although 44% are opposed. Given that George W.<br><br> Bush has made charitable choice a centerpiece of his presidential campaign (although it has also been endorsed by Al Gore), the partisan divisions on this question 4 and the related issue of merely permitting religious groups to apply for government funding 4 are somewhat surprising. 1 For more information on the typology see "Issues and Continuity Now Working for Gore," September 14, 2000 (people-press.org/typo00rpt.htm). -3- Support for Charitable Choice Give government funding Favor Oppose Don't know to religious organizations ...<br><br> %%% All registered voters54442=100 Men50482=100 Women58393=100 White51463=100 Black74242=100 Republican46513=100 Democrat61363=100 Independent52471=100 Allow religious organizations to apply for funding ... All registered voters67294=100 Men60373=100 Women74224=100 White64324=100 Black87112=100 Republican63334=100 Democrat74233=100 Independent64333=100 Fully 61% of Democrats favor funding religious institutions for these purposes, compared with 46% of Republicans and 52% of independents. Support for charitable choice among Democrats is partially driven by strong backing among African-Americans: 74% of blacks endorse direct funding for these programs (compared with 51% of whites), while 87% of blacks favor permitting the churches and other faith-based institutions to apply for government grants (compared with 64% of whites).<br><br> The Center 9s voter typology highlights these unusual political and ideological disparities. For instance, among Democrat-oriented groups, 74% of the Partisan Poor 4 which has a large percentage of minorities and low-income voters 4 favor the direct funding proposal, compared with 61% of New Democrats, 56% of Social Conservatives and just 42% of Liberals. Among GOP-oriented groups, majorities of Moderate Republicans and Populist Republicans (55% and 54%, respectively) support funding religious institutions so they can provide social services, compared with 41% of Staunch Conservatives.<br><br> 1 While more women than men are more supportive of both charitable choice alternatives, there also is strong backing for these proposals among those under age 30, who tend to support secular positions on many questions. Nearly seven-in-ten of those under age 30 (68%) favor direct government funding for faith-based groups; just 46% of those over age 50 agree. -4- Private Belief and Public Expression Important for president Agree Disagree Don't know to have strong religious %%% beliefs ...<br><br> All registered voters70273=100 Men65332=100 Women74233=100 18-2957412=100 30-4971272=100 50-6471245=100 65+78202=100 Republican79201=100 Democrat70264=100 Independent60373=100 I'm uncomfortable when politicians talk about how religious they are ... All registered voters50455=100 Men54415=100 Women46495=100 18-2950482=100 30-4945505=100 50-6450446=100 65+56377=100 Republican46504=100 Democrat53425=100 Independent50473=100 College graduates are among the most likely to oppose charitable choice when the question is posed as direct government help to religious institutions (just 44% support this alternative). But when the issue is presented as a question of religious institutions applying for government grants, along with other organizations, support rises to 63%.<br><br> Interestingly, there are not large differences between those who attend religious services often and those who seldom attend on the question of providing direct government funding for church-based institutions. While 59% of those who attend services more than once a week support that proposal, 52% of those who seldom attend (less than a few times a year) agree. Politicians and Religion Most voters (70%) want the president to be a person of faith.<br><br> But half of the electorate expresses unease with politicians, presidential contenders and others, who talk too much about their religious beliefs. Overall, women are somewhat more likely than men to want a president with strong religious beliefs (74% vs. 65%).<br><br> At the same time, women are slightly less likely than men to feel uncomfortable when politicians talk about their faith (46% vs. 54%). By contrast, young people and particularly young men, are less concerned about the religious beliefs of the president.<br><br> Less than half of men under age 30 (47%) say it is important that he or she have religious beliefs. While the Republican-oriented typology groups are fairly unified in saying it is important for the president to have strong religious beliefs, there are divisions among Democrats. Fully 84% of the Partisan Poor identify this as an important characteristic for the president, and 82% of Social Conservatives agree.<br><br> That number falls to 67% among New Democrats and just 34% among Liberals. -5- Politics in Church, But Not the Pulpit KeepExpressNo Should churches express Out Views Opinion views on politics? %%% All registered voters45514=100 White47503=100 Black33616=100 18-2941581=100 30-4939583=100 50-6449474=100 65+57367=100 Don't Right for clergymen to Yes No Know discuss politics from the pulpit?<br><br> %%% All registered voters32644=100 White31663=100 Black43516=100 18-2943525=100 30-4936613=100 50-6429683=100 65+23734=100 Clearly, the distinction between being religious and talking about religion is more important to some groups than others. For instance, nearly eight-in-ten senior citizens (78%) say it 9s crucial for the president to have strong religious beliefs, but more than half (56%) also say they are uneasy over excessive public expressions of faith by politicians. Similarly, by a lopsided margin of 79%- 18%, African-Americans say it is important for the president to be religious; by a narrower margin (48%-43%) blacks also express discomfort over politicians who talk publicly about their faith.<br><br> Drawing the Line at the Pulpit Just as Americans are split over questions relating to religion 9s influence on politics, so too they are divided over whether churches and other religious institutions are appropriate forums for political discussions. Support for religious institutions and clergy expressing their views on politics is higher now than in the mid-1960s 4 although a substantial number of voters still have reservations. A slim majority of voters (51%) say it is appropriate for churches and other religious organizations to make their views known on political and social topics, while 45% believe these institutions should stay out of politics.<br><br> In 1968, a majority of the public (53%) said churches should remain on the sidelines in political debates, while just 40% supported a political role for religious groups, according to a Gallup poll from that year. But a solid majority (64%) believes it is wrong for members of the clergy to discuss political matters from the pulpit, while just one-in-three voters (32%) find that acceptable. There has been some movement on this question as well, in support of greater political involvement by the clergy.<br><br> A 1965 Gallup survey found that 68% opposed religious leaders expressing their political views, while just 22% favored such expressions. -6- Evangelical Christians Favorable opinion of 1996 2000 evangelical Christians %% All registered voters4163 18-294159 30-494061 50-644363 65+4168 Democrats2760 Republicans6073 Independents3657 African-Americans, white evangelical Protestants and voters under the age of 50 are among the most likely to favor including political discussions as part of church activities. Fully 61% of blacks support this, compared with just half of whites.<br><br> Nearly six-in-ten of all voters under 50 (58%) agree that such political discussions are appropriate. But a strong majority of those 65 and over (57%) believe that churches and other religious organizations should steer clear of political discussions; just 36% of senior citizens are comfortable with such discussions. And while 63% of white evangelicals say churches should express their political views, 50% of white Catholics and 41% of white mainline Protestants agree.<br><br> Partisan differences over this issue are relatively small: 53% of Republicans, 48% of Democrats and 52% of independents say it is acceptable for churches to weigh in on political and social issues. Many of those who are otherwise comfortable with churches and other religious institutions expressing political opinions draw the line at having members of the clergy discussing politics from the pulpit. Majorities in every major demographic group 4 including African-Americans and white evangelicals 4 find this unacceptable.<br><br> But again, senior citizens are among the most reluctant to cross the lines between religion and politics: fully 73% of senior citizens reject this idea while just 23% favor clergymen airing their political views from the pulpit. More Support for Evangelicals While nearly eight-in-ten voters have positive impressions of Catholics and Jews, and six-in- ten feel the same about evangelicals, just half of voters see Muslim-Americans in a favorable light. Nonetheless, voters have a far more favorable impression of every religion tested than they do of atheists.<br><br> Just 32% hold a favorable opinion of atheists. While, on balance, those in every major demographic group hold a negative view of atheists, they are viewed favorably by Liberal Democrats, a group that is the least religious of all typology groups. Fully 65% of Liberals have a positive impression of atheists, far more than other groups in Pew 9s voter typology.<br><br> Evangelical Christians are now viewed much more favorably by many groups than they were four years ago. While the percentage of Democrats holding positive impressions of evangelicals has more than doubled (from 27% to 60%), more Republicans and independents also have favorable opinions of evangelicals. In addition, support for evangelicals has increased across every age group.<br><br> -7- Religion and the Parties RepDemNeither/ Which party is most concerned Party Party Equal/DK with protecting religious values? %%% All registered voters393031=100 Republicans681121=100 Democrats225028=100 Independents332839=100 Is either party too closely tied to religious leaders? All registered voters13681=100 College Grad21574=100 Some College12781=100 H.S.<br><br> Grad & Below8785=100 $75,000 +18478=100 $50,000-$75,00013582=100 Under $50,00010882=100 Democrats Close the Gap The Republican Party is less identified with protecting religious values than it was four years ago, and this has narrowed the gap between the two parties on this issue (from 15 points to nine points). Today, 39% of voters say the GOP is most concerned with protecting religious values, compared with 30% who name the Democrats. Much of the shift on this question has come among independents.<br><br> In 1996, 45% of independents saw the GOP as most concerned with protecting religious values, while 26% cited the Democrats. Now, independents are more closely divided, with 33% citing the Republicans and 28% pointing to the Democrats. The two parties attract similar levels of support when it comes to protecting religious freedom.<br><br> Some 35% of voters name the Democrats as most concerned with protecting religious liberty, while 32% name the GOP. By large margins, Democratic and Republican partisans see their party as most concerned with religious freedom, while independents are split (30% cite Republicans and 29% choose Democrats). Most Americans do not see either party as too closely linked with religious leaders.<br><br> Still, while only 13% see the Republican Party in that way (down from 20% four years ago), sizable minorities in key demographic groups believe the GOP is too closely linked with religious leaders. For instance, one-in five college graduates (21%) identify the Republicans in this way, compared with just 5% who cite the Democrats. In addition, upper-income voters are more likely to say that the GOP is tied too closely with religious leaders.<br><br> -8- FAVORABILITY OF RELIGIOUS GROUPS (Based on Registered Voters) --- Evangelical Christians ------ Jews ------ Catholics --- Favor-Unfavor-Can'tFavor-Unfavor-Can'tFavor-Unfavor-Can't able able Rate able able Rate able able Rate %%%%%%%%% Total 631621=10077815=10078913=100 Sex Male6420167691580911 Female62142477617761014 Race White63181981712791011 Non-white601228561331711019 Black6892358103271920 Hispanic ^ 64142270151581127 Race and Sex White Men64201679912791011 White Women63152282513791011 Age Under 30591823721315741313 30-4961201976915791011 50-6463162177617761113 65+6810228241479516 Sex and Age Men 18-29612316741313761410 Women 18-29571429691318721315 Men 30-4962211771111880911 Women 30-4961192081613781111 Men 50+6718158361181811 Women 50+659267741975916 Education College Grad.5826168451181811 Some College6117227831977914 High School Grad.651223731017781012 <H.S. Grad.67825681517711415 ^ The designation Hispanic is unrelated to the white-black categorization. Question: Now I'd like your opinion of some religious groups.<br><br> (First,) would you say your overall opinion of... (Evangelical Christians/Jews/Catholics) is very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly UNfavorable, or very unfavorable? Continued ...<br><br> -9- --- Evangelical Christians ------ Jews ------ Catholics --- Favor-Unfavor-Can'tFavor-Unfavor-Can'tFavor-Unfavor-Can't able able Rate able able Rate able able Rate %%%%%%%%% Total 631621=10077815=10078913=100 Family Income $75,000+6221178351282711 $50,000-$74,99963201782612791011 $30,000-$49,99962182073918761212 $20,000-$29,99966161880614771112 <$20,0006712218210881109 Region East59192279714761212 Midwest6315227871581514 South63162174818761014 West6418187791478139 Religious Affiliation Total White Protestant7112178271181811 White Protestant Evangelical8151480911781012 White Prot. Non-Evangelical6218208441283611 White Catholic5620247961586410 Secular404416731512553510 Community Size Large City6321167291979912 Suburb6016248051579912 Small City/Town61152477815771013 Rural Area69161578814771112 Party ID Republican73111680713771310 Democrat5919227481880713 Independent57212278715771013 Marital Status Married6318198161379912 Unmarried621523711019751114 Parental Status Parent64162074917751213 Non-parent6117227871579912 Labor Union Union Household6615197771680713 Non-Union Household62172176816771112 -10- FAVORABILITY OF RELIGIOUS GROUPS (Based on Registered Voters) --- Muslim Americans ------ Atheists --- Favor-Unfavor-Can'tFavor-Unfavor-Can't able able Rate able able Rate (N) %%%%%% Total 502129=100325216=100(974) Sex Male542323365014(419) Female471934285319(555) Race White502129335116(797) Non-white502327215920(164) Black512128186814(100) Hispanic ^ 552817325018(65) Race and Sex White Men522424374914(341) White Women481933315217(456) Age Under 30582220355114(149) 30-49562024335116(413) 50-64482428305119(224) 65+342145275716(177) Sex and Age Men 18-29652114494110(75) Women 18-29522325245917(74) Men 30-49571924325216(177) Women 30-49552025345016(236) Men 50+462925345214(163) Women 50+381844245521(238) Education College Grad.611821414217(357) Some College492130285319(255) H.S. Grad & Below442333275716(359) ^ The designation Hispanic is unrelated to the white-black categorization.<br><br> Note small sample size. Question: Now I'd like your opinion of some religious groups. (First,) would you say your overall opinion of...<br><br> (Muslim Americans/Atheists, that is, people who don 9t believe in God) is very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly UNfavorable, or very unfavorable? Continued ... -11- --- Muslim Americans ------ Atheists --- Favor-Unfavor-Can'tFavor-Unfavor-Can't able able Rate able able Rate (N) %%%%%% Total 502129=100325216=100(974) Family Income $75,000+651520404416(185) $50,000-$74,999532522335314(166) $30,000-$49,999472132285319(237) $20,000-$29,999541927354916(96) <$20,000472429276310(101) Region East532027394615(172) Midwest502129305218(248) South442630255817(373) West561628384616(181) Religious Affiliation Total White Protestant472429285715(473) White Protestant Evangelical413128216712(213) White Prot.<br><br> Non-Evangelical521830344818(260) White Catholic551728384319(168) Secular*52291961309(60) Community Size Large City542026325117(200) Suburb501931335017(243) Small City/Town492031325018(367) Rural Area472726285913(157) Party ID Republican502525275914(304) Democrat502030295219(347) Independent531829414316(274) Marital Status Married502228285616(543) Unmarried502030364618(428) Parental Status Parent512524295516(332) Non-parent492031335017(641) Labor Union Union Household542224325513(164) Non-Union Household492130315118(803) * Note small sample size. 2 cRetropolitics: The Political Typology, Version 3.0," November 1999. -12- copyright © 2000 Tides Center Political Typology Groups AdultRegistered Population Voters Typology groups ...<br><br> %% Staunch Conservatives1114 Moderate Republicans911 Populist Republicans 8 9 New Prosperity Independents6 7 Disaffecteds 1111 Liberal Democrats1012 Socially Conservative Democrats 911 New Democrats1113 Partisan Poor1112 Bystanders13 -- ABOUT THE SURVEY Results for the Campaign 2000 Typology Survey are based on telephone interviews conducted under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates among a nationwide sample of 2,799 adults (1,999 registered voters), 18 years of age or older, during the period August 24 3 September 10, 2000. For results based on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling and other random effects is plus or minus 2 percentage points. For results based on registered voters, the sampling error is plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.<br><br> For results based on likely voters (N=1495), the sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points. For results based on either Form 1 (N=1025) or Form 2 (N=974) registered voters, the sampling error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<br><br> ABOUT THE TYPOLOGY The 10-group political typology was developed by the Pew Research Center to classify people on the basis of their political value orientations, partisanship, and political activism. The typology groups presented in this report are a replication of the first typology created for this electoral season, in the fall of 1999. That typology was developed through a two-step statistical procedure involving factor analysis and cluster analysis.<br><br> This procedure is described in more detail in the November 1999 report. 2 The current typology is an approximation of the earlier classification, using the same eight value scales to predict in which typology group a respondent belongs. To increase the efficiency of the procedure, some items that were only moderately associated with a value scale were omitted from the analysis.<br><br> This procedure has been shown to be a close approximation of the full cluster analysis procedure, predicting the same typology group for respondents in fully 84% of all cases. -13- PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS CAMPAIGN 2000 TYPOLOGY SURVEY FINAL TOPLINE August 24 - September 10, 2000 N = 2,799 General Public N = 1,999 Registered Voters NOTE:ALL NUMBERS IN SURVEY, INCLUDING TREND FIGURES, ARE BASED ON REGISTERED VOTERS EXCEPT WHERE NOTED ASK FORM 2 ONLY: [N=974] Q.22F2Now I'd like your opinion of some religious groups. (First,) would you say your overall opinion of...<br><br> (INSERT ITEM; ROTATE. ITEM h SHOULD ALWAYS COME LAST ) is very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly UNfavorable, or very unfavorable? (INTERVIEWERS: PROBE TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN "NEVER HEARD OF" AND "CAN'T RATE") VeryMostlyMostlyVeryNever Favor-Favor-Unfavor-Unfavor-HeardCan't able able able able Of Rate d.F2Evangelical Christians214213 3318=100 February, 1996142724131012=100 May, 199013332017611=100 e.F2Jews2750 5 3*15=100 June, 19972559 6 2*8=100 f.F2Catholics2949 6 3*13=100 g.F2Muslim Americans1139138227=100 h.F2Atheists, that is, people who don 9t believe in God 8242032*16=100 On another subject...<br><br> ASK FORM 1 ONLY: [N=1,025] Q.23F1These days, how much do you think churches, synagogues and mosques contribute to solving important social problems... a great deal, some, not much, nothing at all? 28A great deal 44Some 21Not much 4Nothing at all 3 Don 9t know/Refused 100 -14- ASK FORM 2 ONLY: [N=974] Q.24F2In your opinion, is either the Democratic party or the Republican party TOO CLOSELY tied to religious leaders these days, or not?<br><br> IF YES, ASK: Which party would you say is too closely tied to religious leaders these days? June 1996 13YES, Republican20 6YES, Democratic 3 7Both equally (VOL.) 5 65NO, Neither is too closely tied63 9 Don't know/Refused 9 100100 Now on another subject... Q.30I'd like your opinion of some programs and proposals being discussed in this country today.<br><br> Please tell me if you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or strongly oppose each one. The first one is... (READ AND ROTATE) StronglyStrongly Favor Favor Oppose Oppose DK/Ref.<br><br> ASK FORM 1 ONLY: [N=1,025] b.F1Giving government funding to religious organizations so they can provide social services such as job training or drug treatment counseling to people who need them213327172=100 ASK FORM 2 ONLY: [N=974] c.F2Allowing religious organizations to apply, along with other organizations, for government funding to provide social services such as job training or drug treatment counseling to people who need them323517124=100 On a different subject... Q.35In your opinion, should the churches keep out of political matters 4 or should they express their views on day- to-day social and political questions? --- General Public --- June 1996 June 1996 Gallup : 1968 45Should keep out444353 51Should express views535440 4 No opinion 3 3 7 100100100100 Q.36Do you think it is ever right for clergymen to discuss political candidates or issues from the pulpit?<br><br> --- General Public --- June 1996 June 1996 Gallup : 1965 32Yes292922 64No676668 4 Don't know/Refused 4 5 10 100100100100 -15- Q.37Aside from weddings and funerals how often do you attend religious services... more than once a week, once a week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, seldom, or never? June 1997 June 1996 17More than once a week1315 28Once a week2928 16Once or twice a month1717 17A few times a year1920 13Seldom1312 8Never 9 7 1 Don't know/Refused * 1 100100100 IF RESPONDENT ATTENDS CHURCH AT LEAST A FEW TIMES A YEAR (Q.37=1-4), ASK: [N=1,584] Q.38Aside from attending religious services, how involved are you in church activities, would you say you 9re very involved, somewhat involved, not too involved, or not at all involved 25Very involved 34Somewhat involved 25Not too involved 16Not at all involved * Don 9t know/Refused 100 ASK FORM 1 ONLY: [N=1,025] Q.39F1Thinking about the two major political parties in this country, which one would you say is most concerned with protecting religious values...<br><br> the Republicans or the Democrats? (ROTATE REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS) June 1996 39The Republicans47 30The Democrats32 6Neither (VOL.) 8 7Both equally (VOL.) 3 18 Don't know/Refused10 100100 ASK FORM 2 ONLY: [N=974] Q.40F2Thinking about the two major political parties in this country, which one would you say is most concerned with protecting religious freedom... the Republicans or the Democrats?<br><br> (ROTATE REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS) 32The Republicans 35The Democrats 5Neither (VOL.) 6Both equally (VOL.) 22 Don 9t know/Refused 100 -16- ASK ALL: Q.50Now I am going to read some statements about the candidates and political parties. For each, please tell me if you completely agree with it, mostly agree with it, mostly DISagree with it, or completely DISagree with it. (The first one is...) (INSERT ITEM; ROTATE ITEMS) CompletelyMostlyMostlyCompletelyDon't Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Know FORM 1 ONLY: [N=1,025] h.F1It makes me uncomfortable when politicians talk about how religious they are252526195=100 ASK FORM 2 ONLY: [N=974] q.F2It 9s important to me that a president have strong religious beliefs353517103=100<br><br>

less